Archive for the ‘Social Networking Web Design’ Category

Social Media Banned from College Stadiums

Monday, August 17th, 2009

Today, the Southeastern Conference (SEC) is expected to release a final version of its new media policy. For the sake of sports fans everywhere, let’s hope it has some significant changes from the current version, because at the moment, it can best be described as a ban on all social media usage at SEC games.

Earlier this month, the conference informed its schools of the new policy, which reads: “Ticketed fans can’t “produce or disseminate (or aid in producing or disseminating) any material or information about the Event, including, but not limited to, any account, description, picture, video, audio, reproduction or other information concerning the Event.”

Translated, that means no Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, TwitPic, or any other service that could in any way compete with authorized media coverage of the event. In the case of the SEC, authorized media coverage rights belong to CBS, who has a $3 billion deal with the conference over the next 15 years according to The St Petersburg Times.

While it’s understandable that the SEC wants to protect the value of the CBS contract, banning all social media seems not only unenforceable, but also counter-productive. I can’t count the number of times I’ve turned on a sporting event after seeing friends update their status or upload a picture. By barring social media, much of that would be lost (though couch-side commentators would still be tweeting of course).

The SEC’s move is not unprecedented in the world of sports, however. One could debate what’s implied about social media when Major League Baseball says during telecasts that “any rebroadcast, reproduction or other use of this game without the express written consent of Major League Baseball is prohibited,” though so far it seems that tweeting and photo uploads remain permissible. Meanwhile, at this year’s US Open, I was rather surprised to learn that both phones and cameras weren’t allowed on premises, making any form of social media inaccessible.

For the moment, these policies seem a lot more grounded in fear than reality. Sure, these days someone could theoretically live stream a game from their camera phone. But a shaky, low resolution video from the upper deck of Yankee Stadium isn’t exactly the same as watching FOX’s telecast on your big screen TV. Social media should be viewed a fantastic compliment to sports that is good for both fans and the TV networks, but at the moment, it seems that’s anything but how it’s being perceived.

Reviews: Facebook, Twitpic, Twitter, YouTube

Tags: cbs, college sports, SEC, social media, sports

More: continued here

GPush Finally Brings Push Gmail to the iPhone

Monday, August 17th, 2009

One of the knocks against the iPhone has long been its lack of push email, a feature that is essential to many corporate users who live in their inboxes. It’s one of the major advantages that the BlackBerry has over the iPhone, especially for enterprise users, and even though the iPhone 3.0 software update added support for push notifications, Apple didn’t update the phone’s built-in email application with push.

Edit: As some commenters point out, push email has been available on the iPhone for other email providers, just not for Gmail.

A new 99-cent application from Tiverias Apps called GPush (iTunes link) aims to change that. Calling GPush simple would be an understatement – this app literally has a one-track mind. The only thing it does is provide push notifications for new emails in Gmail. It doesn’t open emails, or send emails, it just lets you know when new ones arrive, as soon as they arrive, and no matter what you’re doing.

Easy Set Up, But a Bit Flaky

GPush is extremely simple to set up: you just enter your Gmail username and password and that’s literally all there is to it (though you can also control sounds and alert permissions from the iPhone’s settings menu). GPush would definitely make Ron Popeil proud – you really can just set it and forget it. Unfortunately, in my testing today, I ran into some issues, and apparently I wasn’t the only one.

The app had two undesirable bugs in my testing. First, it would occasionally pop up alerts for old but unread emails. Second, it would sometimes miss new emails entirely. Resubmitting my account credentials would usually fix it for a bit, but missing emails is a rather egregious offense for an app that’s sole function is to push notifications of new messages.

Still, if they work the bugs out, GPush is certainly worth the 99 cents for anyone who needs to be kept in the loop on a more instant basis than the iPhone’s current fetch functionality offers. According to Tiverias, a premium version is coming that will support push for multiple Gmail accounts. We hope it also emulates some other BlackBerry features, such as notification profiles, so we could control when we get pushed alerts for email on specific accounts (or better yet, for specific filters).

See Also: 14 iPhone Apps With Push Notification for Productivity

Reviews: Gmail

Tags: apps, email, gmail, gpush, iphone, push

More: continued here

If Twitter Consisted of 100 People [Gorgeous Graphics]

Monday, August 17th, 2009

What if Twitter only had 100 users? How many would be chatty, how many lazy?

Based on the data from previous surveys – InsideTwitter and the PearAnalytics study – the InformationIsBeautiful blog has constructed these gorgeous graphics showing the Twitter community represented as 100 people.

While beautiful, the data is being painted with broad strokes: those with 100 followers should overlap with the “loud mouths”, while having more than 100 followers in a population of 100 is technically not possible: it is, of course, a compromise to make the data more accessible via visualization. The original data is also the subject of some debate. Enjoy with a discerning eye.

[hat tip: Philippe Bossin]

Gallery: If the Twitter Community Were 100 People

Reviews: Twitter

More: continued here

New Facebook Lawsuit: This Time, Over Online Privacy Laws

Monday, August 17th, 2009

When you are well known and have some cash in the bank, you’re probably going to get sued at least once in your life. When you are Facebook and you have 250+ million users, increase the amount of lawsuits by a factor of 10 or so. Yes, Facebook has been sued once again, this time for allegedly misleading members on the use of their personal information and for violating California privacy laws.

The Orange County lawsuit was filed on behalf of five Facebook users, according to the AP– a photographer, an actress, two children under 13 (despite needing to be 13 or older to legally use Facebook) and a “user of the original Facebook.” It seeks monetary damages, attorney’s fees, and a trial by jury.

As you’d expect, Facebook believes that there is “no merit to this suit” and intends to fight it. We could go on and on about past Facebook lawsuits, many of them similar to this one. There was the lawsuit seeking $70.50 in damages, the text messaging lawsuit, the iKimbo patent, a class-action lawsuit for Facebook Beacon, the famous ConnectU debacle, and most recently, Power.com suing Facebook over data ownership. We’re pretty sure this list is nowhere near comprehensive.

Look: Facebook faces these types of suits all the time, and most of the time they are either dismissed or settled. Yes, Facebook’s had some thorny affairs with privacy, but recently they’ve been moving in the right direction with Facebook Democracy. Allowing users to vote on their own Terms of Service and letting them vote on changes is more than most sites offer. Besides, this lawsuit complains about common practices being illegal, such as changing the Terms of Service. It essentially rails against Facebook for 40 pages on practically every one of its featurse.

From the parts that we’ve read, we suspect that this California lawsuit doesn’t worry Facebook very much at all.

Reviews: Facebook

Tags: facebook, lawsuit

More: continued here

Digital Textbooks: 3 Reasons Students Aren’t Ready

Monday, August 17th, 2009

For higher education students who spend an average of $702 per year on course materials, mostly textbooks, the prospect of going digital is an appealing one. Among the theoretical benefits of digital textbooks is the possibility of significant cost savings due to lower overhead costs — bits are cheaper than printed pages, after all. Unfortunately, students shouldn’t chuck their backpacks any time soon; there still exist some major hurdles that digital textbooks must overcome before they widely replace traditional, printed textbooks on college (and high school) campuses.

The benefits of digital textbooks are numerous: they’re potentially cheaper, they’re better for the environment (at least so long as you don’t continually need to upgrade your electronic book reader), they weigh less, they can be updated more easily, and they’re more easily searched. But for all that, a number of hurdles still exist.

1. Cost Savings Must be Greater

In theory, digital textbooks should cost a lot less than their printed counterparts. Textbook publishers will always have overhead costs (they must still compensate authors, editors, typesetters/designers, proofreaders, indexers, etc.), but the costs associated with physically printing, binding, warehousing, and shipping the book are eliminated when going digital. Further, many textbook publishers already publish electronic editions of their books. McGraw-Hill, for example, which is one of the largest textbook publishers in the United States, publishes nearly 95% of its books electronically.

In practice, though, the cost savings for electronic textbooks are miniscule. “Human Biology,” a textbook published by Pearson imprint Benjamin Cummings, for example, costs about $50 used, and about $80 new in its printed/hard copy form (according to BigWords.com). Via electronic textbook publisher CourseSmart, the digital version costs just over $70, a savings of about 12.5% over the printed version. However, the printed version can be kept forever or sold back at the end of the semester to mitigate costs, while the electronic version is automatically deleted after 180 days, and requires additional equipment, such as an ebook reader or a laptop computer. As a student, which of these options makes more sense?

“At the moment, there’s not a lot of [cost savings],” Tom Rosenthal, the senior manager of electronic product sales at textbook publisher Academic Press, told the Wall Street Journal. Those cost savings will have to become more significant for students to start opting for electronic texts over printed ones.

2. A Standard Format is Needed

When Amazon announced the larger format Kindle DX in May, and along with it a pilot digital textbook program at several major US universities to be launched this fall — including Princeton, UVA, Case Western, Arizona State, and Reed College — we called it “a game changer.” But it also raises a very important question about formats and ebook compatibility issues.

There are many different competing ebook formats and a huge number of textbook publishers that don’t all use the same format. If I buy a book on the Kindle, it may not necessarily be available on my Sony reader (and I certainly won’t be able to transfer that specific purchase from one reader to the other), and if I buy a book through CourseSmart, I need to use their proprietary software to download it. What that means for students in a practical sense is that vendor lock-in might prohibit them from going print-free even if they wanted to, because not all of their required course materials may be available for the reader or software they invested in. Because buying an ebook reader is a significant initial cost outlay, it’s hard to expect students to make that investment without assurances that all, or at least nearly all, of their required books will be available in that format.

With ebook readers expected in the next year from Plastic Logic, Hearst, and News Corp., and the much-rumored “Apple Tablet” on the horizon, things may only get more muddled.

3. Questions of Ownership

One of the most important stumbling points for the adoption of digital texts is the question of who actually owns the books. CourseSmart’s books, for example, generally only last for 180 days before being automatically deleted, which means that students are essentially renting them for a set period of time. That’s not a consideration students need to make when purchasing a hard copy book from a bookstore, where the answer to question of ownership is very clear.

Further, the recent Orwellian (literally) case of Amazon remotely deleting books from Kindle readers, has rightly raised a number of eyebrows. One high school student even filed a lawsuit against the ecommerce giant when, as he claims, the notes he had made on the book for school were “rendered useless because they no longer referenced the relevant parts of the book,” as a result of the remote deletion.

“Amazon.com had no more right to hack into people’s Kindles than its customers have the right to hack into Amazon’s bank account to recover a mistaken overpayment,” said Jay Edelson, the lawyer who filed the case.

If students feel that they don’t actually own the textbooks they purchase, or that their books might be taken away before they are done with them (or that their notes might be damaged), they’re unlikely to embrace electronic textbooks.

Conclusion

Digital textbooks are indeed a potential game changer, and they are likely going to be a major part of the future of academia. A year from now, the National Associated of College Stores estimates that digital textbooks could account for 15% of all textbook sales. However, for that to happen, textbook publishers, ebook reader manufacturers, and schools must first address some of the major hurdles that are making students wary of electronic books.

Further, in addition to the problems that exist with the digital books themselves, electronic textbook publishers also need to overcome deeply ingrained student behavior. For many students, the idea of reading words on a screen is not as appealing as on a printed page. That may change as more so-called digital natives progress into higher education and as ebook reader technology gets better, but for now, 60% of students would rather pay for a low-cost printed book than use a free digital version.

“We may have actually made enough progress for this to be a landmark device, but the caveat that humans have proven is that they are resistant to change,” said Andrew Dillon, Dean of the University of Texas School of Information about the Kindle DX device. “Fighting 700 years of human familiarity with paper is a huge challenge.”

Would you use electronic textbooks if available? Let us know in the comments.

See also: In the Future, the Cost of Education Will Be Zero

Image courtesy of iStockphoto, gibsonff

Reviews: iStockphoto

Tags: amazon kindle, ebook reader, ebooks, electronic textbook, kindle dx, textbooks

More: continued here

NPR’s iPhone App Blows Other News Apps Out of the Water

Monday, August 17th, 2009

NPR finally has an iPhone app, and it is awesome.

NPR News [iTunes link], which just became available for download, offers the same core features of other news apps like AP Mobile [iTunes link], primarily that you can browse the day’s big stories and read news articles in multiple categories. However, no other news app is linked to 1000+ NPR radio stations, news programs, and live streams, meaning you can listen to your news anywhere, anytime.

The App adds a strong audio layer to the news reading experience. While it’s simple enough to read the day’s top stories, you can also listen to most of the day’s top stories as well. A speaker icon next to most articles allows you to listen in on stories, and the playlist feature lets you queue up the stories you want to listen to if you’re busy, on-the-go, or just need to keep occupied.

The other key aspect of NPR News is that you can listen to any NPR program and any NPR station, including both live radio and past shows and podcasts. There has to be thousands upon thousands of hours of archived content available, not including the live radio. You can even pick out your station with GPS.

While many news organizations are floundering in the era of social media and even struggling to survive, NPR has thrived. Its innovative social strategies have served it well, and the NPR News iPhone app is just the latest solid innovation from the non-profit news organization.

If you want to learn more, NPR’s Scott Simon (host of Weekend Edition Saturday) explains and demos the app in this YouTube video:

One thing it seems to be missing though are push notificaitons for breaking stories, something the AP Mobile App currently employs.

Reviews: YouTube

Tags: iphone, NPR

More: continued here

Top 10 Facebook Songs on YouTube

Sunday, August 16th, 2009

Last month we brought you the Top 5 Twitter Songs on YouTube…but it’s not just the microblogging site that has earned musical tributes. With Facebook’s global audience and mainstream popularity, dozens of odes have been penned; we’ve narrowed them down to just 10 of the best.

From rap to musical theatre, we bring you the best Facebook songs on YouTube.

The Facebook Song (RhettandLink)

An Internet comedy duo put Facebook to music, with hilarious results. Best verse: “Before the Internet, friendship was so tough / you actually had to be in people’s presence and stuff / who would’ve thought that with a point and a click / I could know that Hope Floats is your favorite flick?”

The Facebook Skit

Enrique Iglesias’ Hero is co-opted by a Facebook stalker.

Honest Graduation Song (College Humor)

College Humor tells the nostalgic story of two high school buddies who take separate paths in life, with Facebook as their only connection. Alas, a change in fortunes necessitates a switch to LinkedIn. (Available on YouTube, embedded from College Humor.)

R U F**king Kidding Me (Kate Miller-Heidke)

Australian singer-songwriter Kate Miller-Heidke performs her humorous and familiar tale about a past love who tries to add her on Facebook. (Warning: strong language.)

Mr. Creepy Facebook Stalker Guy

A short and sweet tribute to Mr Creepy Facebook Stalker Guy and his leery ways.

2005 Miami U. Cheezies a cappella: Facebook Song

From back in 2006, the “Miami U. Cheezies” perform their ode to Facebook. Inspired by the Everly Brothers.

Vince Dyer’s Facebook.com Song

“Won’t you be my friend / I just want some friends / on Facebook”, goes the refrain. Cute.

Facebook Gangsta

A man lives a double-life through Facebook. (Note: strong language on this one too.)

Facebook Anthem

Too many people have turned “We Didn’t Start the Fire” into Internet parodies….so here’s another.

Be My Friend (The Facebook Song)

Edges, a musical by Benj Pasek and Justin Paul, famously features the song “Be My Friend”: here’s Penn State’s live performance.

Know of better Facebook songs? Let us know in the comments.

Reviews: Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

More: continued here

SEARCH SHOWDOWN: Microsoft’s Plan to Win the Search War

Sunday, August 16th, 2009

The search landscape has dramatically shifted in the last three months, and it’s all because of Microsoft. First, Microsoft revealed Bing, its new and rebranded search engine. The tech giant then went on an advertising and promotion spree. Still, that was nothing to the blockbuster Microsoft-Yahoo search deal that now gives Microsoft huge ammunition in its war with Google.

Recently, I had the chance to chat with members of the Microsoft team and learn more about the challenges they believe they face in the search market as well as their plan to overcome and dominate the search engine landscape. A few interesting tidbits were revealed, like who they are targeting, how they intend to reach them, and what has to be done for Bing to have any chance in its uphill battle.

Bing’s Holy Trinity

While most people think that search is essentially a numbers game (the more people you have using your search engine, the better), Microsoft actually divides its target audience for Bing into three main categories. They are as follows:

Consumers: This the largest and most obvious target. Microsoft need more eyeballs and more searches. What’s interesting is who they are targeting and how they are reaching them. I discuss that in the next section.

Advertisers: Advertisers are just as important as the users of Bing because, let’s face it: they pay the bills. Microsoft has stated on multiple occasions that they believe they have a better return for their advertisers and better qualified traffic. I was told specifically that the conversion rate for Bing is also higher than it was for Live, a very good sign.

Developers/Webmasters: Microsoft is really learning from the success of the Facebook and Twitter platforms. On both, 3rd party developers drove new apps and big innovations for both by using application programming interfaces (APIs). Bing looks to do the same. So far, they have over 14,500 developers signed up for the API, with the two biggest examples probably being Careerbuilder and, of course, Facebook.

People underestimate the power of the third party developer. Twitter has received significant press and users due to apps like TweetDeck and Summize, the search app that Twitter acquired and transformed into Twitter Search. It’s those kinds of apps and acquisitions that can really change the game.

Microsoft knows who it’s targeting. The question is how to reach them.

The Strategy, Part 1: Change Perception

One of the most difficult things to do in business is to change consumer behavior. Getting people to switch brands just doesn’t come easy, and Microsoft is well aware of the uphill battle it faces.

The search engine market is, for the most part, mature. That’s not to say that search engines have reached their apex in terms of functionality (the Bing team strongly feels that search can do far more), but that you’re not going to find many customers who’ve never used a search engine. Instead, it’s about taking market share. In the case of search, that would be Google.

To win the search war, Microsoft is implementing a two-part strategy focused on changing consumer behavior. The first part of that plan is to change perceptions. Users see Google as the best search engine around, or perhaps just the only one that they need. The challenge is overcoming the “if it works, why switch?” mentality (something highlighted in a Catalyst usability study last month). Microsoft is attacking those perceptions on two fronts:

Advertising: Maybe you saw that Bing fast-forwarded commercials on The Daily Show, or maybe you saw the spectacle that was the Bingathon. It’s part of that highly-reported $100 million advertising campaign Microsoft launched.

Microsoft isn’t just spending ad money randomly though; they do have a target audience: heavy Internet users. Specifically they are targeting early adopters, more advanced searchers, and users more willing to try out new things and potentially switch. According to the Bing team, heavy Internet users make up about 39% of the search market and over half of all searches, so it absolutely makes sense. These people also tend to be thought leaders, and the Bing team realizes that personal referrals are best way to get people to switch.

So why are Bing ads on Hulu, Late Night with Jimmy Fallon, and The Daily Show? Because they are all used by the heavy Internet user demographic. This is the current Bing advertising strategy.

Community: Advertising is a top-down approach to reaching the consumer, but Microsoft wants to reach thought leaders and get them on Bing. This is why it also has a bottom-up community-oriented strategy to changing user perception. This is where Bing’s social media initiatives come into play. Everything from Bing jingle contests to @Bing on Twitter is being used to build an active community that will evangelize Bing to others.

Microsoft also monitors social media buzz for the major search engines. While buzz in the past generally reflected the search engine market (aka Google dominating the buzz), Microsoft’s gained in buzz since it launched Bing. The question of whether that elevated chatter continues long after Bing becomes novel has yet to be answered.

The Strategy, Part 2: Drive Trial

Part 2 of the Microsoft search strategy is straightforward: drive trial. The more people use it, the more inclined they should be to use Bing as their preferred search engine. Microsoft believes that Bing speaks for itself, plain and simple. You’d expect that from most companies and their products.

The Microsoft plan for driving trial is also divided into two primary approaches:

Distribution: Microsoft has a huge asset in its bid to upstage Google, and that is its distribution channels, most of them from Windows. You have a better shot at adoption if you expose consumers to Bing from the start. Become the default on Dell and Lenovo laptops, get on Verizon phones, and get exposure as part of Facebook search. It all helps.

Going to the people: Microsoft realizes that they’re not going to get everyone to Bing.com, so the other part of their plan is to bring Bing to the people. Get search on mobile phones, encourage developers to build 3rd party apps, and encouraging the installation of browser extensions are all part of that initiative. Make it as easy as possible for the user to find and interact with Bing.

The Heat Is On

On the day that the Microsoft-Yahoo deal was announced, we asked whether Google vs. Microsoft would play out any differently. Bing is, after, at least the fourth iteration of Microsoft’s search engine, and each time Microsoft has failed to make a dent in Google’s dominance.

However, it feels like Microsoft’s taking a different approach to the search war, one that has already shown results. While Live Search wasn’t really positioned as anything beyond a Google alternative, Bing’s features and image are targeted towards the heavy Internet user, at least to start.

It’s tough to see any circumstance where Bing overtakes Google in search. However, anything can happen, and Microsoft more than ever is gunning for Google’s stranglehold on search.

The heat is on.

Reviews: Bing, Facebook, Google, Hulu, TweetDeck, Twitter

Tags: bing, Google, microsoft

More: continued here

Twitter Talkback: What Makes a Quality Tweet?

Sunday, August 16th, 2009

Soren Gordhamer is the author of Wisdom 2.0: Ancient Secrets for the Creative and Constantly Connected (HarperOne, 2009). His homepage is: www.sorengordhamer.com. You can follow him on Twitter.

Many of you have likely read about the recent study that revealed that 40% of tweets are “pointless babble.” OK, there may be a place for such babble, but 40% is pretty high.

It begets the question, “What then makes a quality tweet?”

The answer to this, in fact, may determine the long-term success of Twitter. As a completely user-generated content website, the quality of its content is, well, up to us users. Sure, Twitter management can add or take away features and keep the site running, but whether a new user signs on to see pointless babble or quality content is solely and completely up to us!

Below are my four categories in which most high quality tweets I read fall under. But we’re most interested in what you think makes for an interesting Tweet: let us know in the comments.

1. Informative

Helps us learn. . .

This generally includes links to articles that help us learn about a subject in which we have interest. This is particularly useful from people who have a great deal of knowledge in a particular subject area, be it democracy, Buddhism, open source technology, or another subject, and who take the time to share what they know and discover.

Instead of needing to surf the web to stay up on all our interest areas, these tweets save us time and we can trust others to inform us of relevant information.

2. Humorous

Makes us smile…

Who doesn’t want to sign on to Twitter and be given a reason to smile? I am happy to do so any time, and welcome tweets that bring a little lightness to my day. Such tweets do not need to chide or make fun of anyone in particular, but can simply be in the form of sharing a joke, a new perspective, or a scene from one’s life that others may also enjoy.

3. Personal

Tells us something about the person…

This is delicate, and probably the most challenging of all. Few of us likely want to know all the details of a person’s life: after all, we have our own life to live. However, we also want to get to know the person behind the tweets. Along with links to articles, tweets that give us insights into a person’s personality, interests, and concerns are helpful. When people reveal such information and show us the “backstory” of their life, we feel as if we better know them.

4. Inspiring

Helps us increase quality of our lives…

Most of us seek to live more wisely and effectively, and welcome tweets that provide us insight and inspiration on how to do so. These can include wisdom from that user or quotes the person has come across. These tweets serve both to inspire and to guide us on living with greater purpose and meaning.

Your Turn

Now that we know that roughly 40% of our tweets are meaningless babble, it may be time to up the bar somewhat. After all, the future of Twitter could depend on it.

Please let us know in the comments: What do you think makes a quality tweet?

More Twitter resources from Mashable:

- When Do You Use Twitter Versus Facebook?

- 30+ More Ways to Create Twitter Groups

- Twitter Better: 20 Ways to Filter Your Tweets

- 19 Twitter Desktop Apps Compared

Reviews: Twitter

Tags: tweet, twitter

More: continued here
Powered by SmartRSS

Twitter vs. Facebook: Who Will Win in Real-time Search?

Sunday, August 16th, 2009

Just over a year ago, Twitter acquired a small startup, Summize, a search engine for tweets. Once the deal was done, Twitter launched Twitter Search, and the real-time search revolution began.

Because of that acquisition, real-time search has exploded. Twitter Search and trending topics have become a staple of the Twitterverse. It has also become one of the top tools for tracking major world events (i.e. the #IranElection crisis).

For the last year, Twitter has had no major rival in real-time search. But last week, that all changed when Facebook launched its real-time search engine. Not only can it search status updates, but it also tracks photos, notes, videos, and more. Can Facebook, with its larger userbase and recent talent acquisition, make Twitter Search irrelevant? Or does Twitter’s open platform and first-mover advantage give it the edge?

The Case for Twitter

It’s tough to believe, but Twitter Search has only been around for a year. Still, that year has provided it with its position as the current leader in real-time search. When you want to see how people are reacting to Tiger Woods’s stunning loss or the protests in Iran, you turn to Twitter.

Here are three of Twitter’s biggest advantages over Facebook when it comes to real-time search:

First mover advantage: Twitter was first, and that has made it an established leader in this realm. Millions of people know and use Twitter search regularly.

More experience: Twitter has a full year’s worth of experience with real-time search. It has had to time to figure out what works, what does not, and adjust accordingly. It can respond lightning fast to anything Facebook may put out.

Open platform: Perhaps Twitter’s biggest advantage over Facebook search is that almost every Twitter user has a public account, meaning that his or her tweets are indexable. This provides for a great deal of information while searching. Twitter Search is why Twitter is quickly becoming the world’s water cooler.

The Case for Facebook

While the new Facebook Search only launched this week, the new real-time search platform can search far more than status updates. With access to 250+ million users, the world’s largest social network can tap into photos, links, events, apps, and more for its new search engine.

Facebook’s got several things going for it in the battle for real-time search. Here are three of the top ones:

Larger userbase: Size does matter. Facebook has over 250 million users, over 90 million U.S. visits a month and even larger reach overseas. Twitter has just above 25 million U.S. visits a month and nowhere near the amount of users. With more people to draw on, Facebook can provide a more accurate representation of what people are talking about. Plus most likely you have more close friends on Facebook than you do on Twitter.

More diverse search: Facebook Search is richer in scope. There’s something to be said for being able to find videos and photos related to your real-time search, and you can filter your results as well.

The other strength is that you can search the posts of both your friends and all public profiles. Facebook allows you to find out what your friends are buzzing about as well as what the entire world is discussing. A lack of public profiles on Facebook hinders its effectiveness for now, though.

FriendFeed: Did you know that FriendFeed has a real-time search engine, and that it’s really good to boot? FriendFeed is filled with talented people and real-time technology. The former head of Google Maps and the creator of Gmail are both co-founders of the startup and are now top members of the Facebook team. They know how to build a real-time engine, and they will bring that expertise to Facebook Search.

Who Do You Think Will Win?

You can argue compellingly that either company will eventually win out in real-time search, or even that the market’s big enough for both companies. Heck, Google could launch a real-time search engine and sweep away both Facebook and Twitter Search, or a start-up could make a big impact.

That’s why we want to hear from you. Who do you think will win the real-time search war? Will it be Twitter, with its tremendous growth and open platform, or will it be Facebook, with its enormous user base and rich technology? Cast your vote, and then leave your reasoning in the comments:

Who will be the winner in real-time search?(surveys)

Reviews: Facebook, FriendFeed, Gmail, Google, Google Maps, Twitter, tweetzi Twitter Search

Tags: facebook, real-time search, Search, twitter

More: continued here

  • About Me

    A little something about you, the author. Nothing lengthy, just an overview.

  • You are currently browsing the archives for the Social Networking Web Design category.